Securities transfer tax and "earnout" provisions

Author: Ben Strauss (Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr) Often parties to a sale of shares agreement agree to an ‘earnout’ or ‘agterskot’ clause: a provision that part of the price will be paid in future if certain conditions are met. For example, the parties may agree that, while the seller must transfer ownership of all the shares to the purchaser at the time of the sale, the purchaser will pay a part of the purchase price only if the company reaches specified financial targets in future. 

Disposals by share incentive trusts

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) issued Binding Private Ruling 174 (Ruling) on 29 July 2014. The applicant was a share incentive trust established by a local company for the benefit of its employees in senior management. It was proposed that the company would make cash contributions to the trust and the trust would use the cash to purchase shares in the company on the open market. In terms of the incentive scheme, the trust would award the shares in tranches to the employees over a period. When the shares vest, the trust would transfer the shares to the employees.

VAT – Importation of goods

The requirements for claiming VAT when importing goods to South Africa have always been contentious and the affected VAT vendors are often unsure about the documentary evidence they need to retain to survive a SARS VAT audit. Even SARS offices interpret or enforce the provisions of the VAT Act differently. For example, some allow the clearing agent’s invoice as proof of import and others accept payment to the clearing agent as proof that VAT has been paid. Even the timing for claiming the input tax deduction has been disputed. These uncertainties have resulted in many VAT vendors receiving significant assessments, penalties and interest charges from SARS.

Request for "relevant material" by SARS

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has extensive powers in terms of the Tax Administration Act No. 28 of 2011 (the TAA). In terms of section 46(1) of the TAA, SARS may, for the purposes of the administration of a tax Act in relation to a taxpayer, require such taxpayer or another person (third party) to submit relevant material that SARS requires within a reasonable period. SARS may require such relevant material to be submitted orally or in writing.

Legal professional privilege

On 17 March 2014 judgment was handed down in the Western Cape High Court in the case of A Company and two others v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (case no 16360/2013 – as yet unreported). The facts were briefly as follows: The applicants were three companies in a group of companies. In the course of conducting an audit of the applicants’ tax affairs, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) directed a request for relevant material at the applicants in terms of section 46 of the Tax Administration Act, No 28 of 2011(the TAA).

Changes to payroll tax forms submission to SARS

Manually completed payroll tax forms dropped-off at a SARS branch or posted, will no longer be accepted from 25 August 2014. The forms impacted include: Monthly Employer Declaration (EMP201) Employer Reconciliation Declaration (EMP501) Employee Tax Certificates [IRP5/IT3(a)] Tax Certificate Cancellation Declaration (EMP601) Reconciliation Declaration Adjustment (EMP701). Top Tip: An exception will be made for employers with a maximum of five IRP5/IT3(a)s. In such cases the employer can still go into a SARS branch where an agent will help them capture these IRP5/IT3(a)s and the EMP501.