Render unto Caesar – Harsh Tax Penalties Reviewed

JOHANNESBURG – Taxpayers who accidentally reduce their tax liability due to a reasonable mistake without any intent to defraud the Taxman, won’t be subjected to harsh understatement penalties in future. The Tax Administration Laws Amendment Bill was introduced in the National Assembly last week and revises regulations to such an extent that the South African Revenue Service (Sars) won’t impose penalties in cases where the understatement by the taxpayer “results from a bona fide inadvertent error”. This follows criticism from tax practitioners and taxpayers on the harsh penalties previously imposed even where taxpayers had no intention of deceiving Sars.

Income protection policies: deduction for premiums to be abolished

By Dan Foster, associate director: International Executive Services, KPMG  Employees earning remuneration are generally prohibited from claiming tax deductions for any expenditure other than those items listed in section 23(m) of the Income Tax Act (58 of 1962). This is in contrast to persons carrying on a trade independently of an employer. One of the few deductions still available to employees is for premiums paid on income protection insurance policies. Currently, such premiums are deductible if (a) the policy covers the person against loss of income as a result of

South African Personal Income Tax

What is it? Income tax is the normal tax which is paid on your taxable income.   Examples of amounts an individual may receive, and from which the taxable income is determined, include – Remuneration (income from employment), such as, salaries, wages, bonuses, overtime pay, taxable (fringe) benefits, allowances and certain lump sum benefits Profits or losses from a business or trade

SARS to fight for its fair share of the tax pie

 Earlier this year Minister Pravin Gordhan (“the Minister”) announced the members of the Tax Review Committee (“the committee”) as well as the committee’s terms of reference. The terms of reference for the committee include inquiring into the role of the South African tax system in the promotion of inclusive economic growth, employment creation, development and fiscal sustainability. The committee is required to take into account recent domestic and global developments and, in particular, the long-term objectives of the National Development Plan (NDP) and thereafter make recommendations to the Minister. Any tax proposals arising from these recommendations will be announced as part of the normal budget and legislative processes.

Securities lending – tax implications arising from the taking of cash collateral

South African residents are taxed on their worldwide income.  In particular, the Income Tax Act includes in “gross income” any amount received or accrued that is not of a capital nature. Based on case law, an amount “accrues” to a taxpayer when the taxpayer becomes unconditionally entitled to receive it (CIR v Genn and Company (Pty) Ltd, (20 SATC 113)).

Proposed employment tax incentive for hiring young workers

The Draft Employment Tax Incentive Bill, 2013 (“DETIB”) was published by National Treasury during September 2013 and gives effect to the proposals to subsidise the cost of hiring younger workers as first announced by Government in 2010.  According to the Media Statement, this new incentive is aimed at encouraging employers to hire young and less experienced work seekers,

Tax Adminstration Act No 28 of 2011 – Tax Litigation

Tax litigators will now have to consider, inter alia, the impact of certain provisions under the Tax Administration Act No. 28 of 2011 (the TAA) as amended by the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act No. 21 of 2012 on the doctrine of legal professional privilege and a recent judgment reflecting the view of a court with regards to the adherence to the rules of the Tax Court by the South African Revenue Service (SARS).

Shuttleworth V The South African Reserve Bank

Author: Alastair Morphet (CliffeDekkerHofmeyr) Mr Shuttleworth famously sold his shares in Thawte, which earned him a substantial amount of money. He subsequently decided to emigrate from the Republic and to transfer all of his remaining assets out of the country. The South African Reserve Bank imposed a 10% levy on his South African assets as a condition for permission under the Exchange Control Regulations to transfer his assets out of the country. He subsequently approached the North Gauteng High Court to set aside the decision of the Reserve Bank to impose the 10% levy.