Tax News

SARS catching up with the Mpisanes

The SA Revenue Service (SARS) has been granted permission to seize five properties belonging to Shauwn and Sbu Mpisane, it was reported.Mpisane’s firm had history with tax returns Mpisane’s firm had history with tax returns. Mpisane lawyers accuse prosecution of suppressing information Mpisane lawyers accuse prosecution of suppressing information The five properties were in a trust which would be held by SARS pending the outcome of an ongoing investigation into the couple’s business and personal financial affairs, The Mercury reported.

Recognition of the controlling bodies of tax practitioners?

The Tax Administration Act, 2011, has been amended to require tax practitioners to register with a recognised controlling body by 1 July 2013, in addition to the existing requirement that they register with SARS. This amendment is intended to provide a framework that will ensure that tax practitioners are appropriately qualified and that a mechanism is available, both to taxpayers and SARS, to address misconduct.

Safeguard Against Penalties With A Tax Opinion

South African Revenue Services (SARS) may raise understatement penalties if prejudice has been caused to them or the fiscus. Penalties can be imposed at 25% or 50% in the case of a ‘substantial understatement’. There are however circumstances when, notwithstanding that the taxpayer has erred, SARS will remit the penalty if the taxpayer is in possession of an opinion by a registered tax practitioner.

How tax can affect your residential property investment

Returns, pitfalls and tax breaks in a nutshell Tax can make or break the potential returns from an investment in residential property. To benefit from possible tax breaks while avoiding the pitfalls, investors should be aware that different investment vehicles can significantly increase or reduce their tax liability. In this article we focus on the purchase of property for the purpose of earning a return rather than for use as a primary residence.

Customs search procedures are declared unconstitutional

Source: Candice Collins Under the Customs and Excise Act, 1964 (Act) invasive searches of houses and business premises that are not designated premises are permissible and a High Court has declared a law allowing such searches unconstitutional and void. On 8 April 2013, the Western Cape High Court in the matter of Patrick Lorenz Martin and Gaertner and 2 Others v The Minister of Finance, Commissioner: SARS