SARS: 15 years in jail a warning to rogue staff

SARS hopes a long jail sentence handed down to a former employee convicted of racketeering will deter staff from committing fraud. Yesterday (23 May 2013), the Cape Town High Court sentenced Edmund Fredericks and Aaron Carelse to 15 years in jail. Judge Daniel Dlodlo found that Fredericks, a former SARS employee, had been the key figure in several VAT and income tax scams. The two men were found guilty of fraud, forgery and “participating in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering”.

Does Sars invade your privacy?

Behind the Taxman’s controversial warrantless search powers. Finding a balance between taxpayers’ rights and Sars’s powers to search premises can prove difficult, especially in cases where a tax official does not have a warrant. The “warrantless search and seizure”, a controversial new power introduced in the Tax Administration Act that came into effect last year, has been debated at length since it was first proposed a couple of years ago. The criticism against the provision stems from fears that a warrantless search could infringe certain constitutional rights of taxpayers such as taxpayers’ right to privacy or fair administrative action.

SARS catching up with the Mpisanes

The SA Revenue Service (SARS) has been granted permission to seize five properties belonging to Shauwn and Sbu Mpisane, it was reported.Mpisane’s firm had history with tax returns Mpisane’s firm had history with tax returns. Mpisane lawyers accuse prosecution of suppressing information Mpisane lawyers accuse prosecution of suppressing information The five properties were in a trust which would be held by SARS pending the outcome of an ongoing investigation into the couple’s business and personal financial affairs, The Mercury reported.

Recognition of the controlling bodies of tax practitioners?

The Tax Administration Act, 2011, has been amended to require tax practitioners to register with a recognised controlling body by 1 July 2013, in addition to the existing requirement that they register with SARS. This amendment is intended to provide a framework that will ensure that tax practitioners are appropriately qualified and that a mechanism is available, both to taxpayers and SARS, to address misconduct.

Safeguard Against Penalties With A Tax Opinion

South African Revenue Services (SARS) may raise understatement penalties if prejudice has been caused to them or the fiscus. Penalties can be imposed at 25% or 50% in the case of a ‘substantial understatement’. There are however circumstances when, notwithstanding that the taxpayer has erred, SARS will remit the penalty if the taxpayer is in possession of an opinion by a registered tax practitioner.

Wider powers for Sars a wake-up call

Sars has gazetted far-reaching new regulations that will give it access to a greater range of third-party information it can use to cross-check returns submitted by taxpayers.”These new regulations will greatly enhance Sars’ ability to verify the accuracy of information submitted by taxpayers,” says Ettiene Retief, chairperson of the National Tax and Sars Stakeholders Committees at the South African Institute of Professional Accountants (Saipa). “It’s a clear indication that Sars is getting more serious about collecting the tax monies due to it.”