Background ITC 13003 [2013] involved the disposal of shares by a taxpayer and whether the proceeds realised constituted gross income and were of a revenue nature. The taxpayer happened to be a Special Purpose Vehicle and it was argued that the proceeds of the sale of shares were of a capital nature. There were also additional costs incurred which were closely associated with the acquisition of the shares in question. These costs incurred were the so-called ’equity-kicker’ and ‘indemnity costs’.
Category: Interpretation Notes
Residency Status Of a Non-Resident Who Applies For a Temporary Residence Permit
Author: PwC Now that South Africa has a residence-based system of income tax, a decision by a non-resident to become tax-resident in South Africa has the result that his world-wide income will become subject to tax in South Africa, save to the extent that relief is given by a double-tax agreement or that unilateral relief is available in terms of section 6 quat of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. It is therefore not a decision to be taken lightly.
The Respective Jurisdiction Of The Tax Court And The High Court
An aggrieved taxpayer who wishes to institute legal proceedings against SARS in relation to some aspect of his tax affairs must be sure to raise his grievance in the proper forum. That forum may be either the Tax Court or the High Court.
SARS audits and taxpayers’ rights
The Tax Administration Act, Act 28 of 2011 (‘the TAA’) came into effect on 1 October 2012. Its promulgation brought with it many changes to not only taxpayers’ rights and obligations but the reciprocal rights and obligations on the part of the South African Revenue Service (‘SARS’) in its continuous business of revenue collection. Some of the amendments and repeals of sections previously contained in the Income Tax Act, Act 58 of 1962 (‘the Act’) have seen a welcome improvement in taxpayers’ rights. One of these improvements is contained in section 42 of the Act.
Securities lending – tax implications arising from the taking of cash collateral
South African residents are taxed on their worldwide income. In particular, the Income Tax Act includes in “gross income” any amount received or accrued that is not of a capital nature. Based on case law, an amount “accrues” to a taxpayer when the taxpayer becomes unconditionally entitled to receive it (CIR v Genn and Company (Pty) Ltd, (20 SATC 113)).
Tax Admistration Act – Jurisdiction of the courts
When litigating against SARS, it is of critical importance that the taxpayer institute proceedings in the proper forum. In this regard, an important question arises as to which issues are justiciable in the Tax Court and which in the High Court. A wrong decision by the taxpayer and his advisers may have the consequence that time limits to bring proceedings in the correct court have expired, and that the taxpayer is left without a remedy.
Tax Adminstration Act No 28 of 2011 – Tax Litigation
Tax litigators will now have to consider, inter alia, the impact of certain provisions under the Tax Administration Act No. 28 of 2011 (the TAA) as amended by the Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act No. 21 of 2012 on the doctrine of legal professional privilege and a recent judgment reflecting the view of a court with regards to the adherence to the rules of the Tax Court by the South African Revenue Service (SARS).
Binding Ruling – BPR 143 – Headquarter company
Binding Private Ruling 143, dated 2 May 2013, issued in terms of section 76Q of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 (the Act), deals with whether certain preference shares held by the applicant (a public company incorporated and resident in South Africa) qualify as equity shares in the context of the definition of headquarter company in section 1 of the Act.
‘Unfair’ SARS Penalties To Be Challenged
Author: Amanda Visser (BDlive) Taxpayers can resist the payment of huge understatement penalties levied on tax returns submitted prior to the commencement of the Tax Administration Act (TAA) in October last year, according to tax experts. The practice by the South African Revenue Service (SARS) to levy these penalties — a percentage-based penalty determined with reference to a taxpayer’s behaviour — under the new act on tax returns that were filed and even assessed prior to the effective date of the act is therefore set to be challenged in the tax courts, and even in the high courts.
Binding class ruling on dividends distributed by a foreign company
On July 24 2013 The South African Revenue Service (SARS) issued Binding Class Ruling 41 regarding the question of whether a dividend distributed by a foreign company constitutes a ‘foreign dividend’ as defined in Section 1 of the Income Tax Act (58/1962). The applicant was a foreign corporate partnership limited by shares. Its structure was essentially a hybrid between a partnership and a limited liability company, which is