Durban tender queen Shauwn Mpisane has walked out of the Durban Regional Court a free woman after the state withdrew more than 100 tax fraud charges against her. Mpisane, the owner of Zikhulise Cleaning, Maintenance and Transport, was charged with defrauding the SA Revenue Service of R4.7 million by submitting false VAT invoices, but applied to National Director of Public Prosecutions Advocate Mxolisi Nxasana to have the case withdrawn over prosecutorial misconduct. This morning Nxasana was at court for the hearing, at which prosecutor Arno Rossouw told Magistrate Blessing Msane that he had been instructed to withdraw the case in terms of Section 6 (b) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Category: GAAR
The limitation of deductions for untaxed interest
Author: Kyle Mandy (PwC) The Taxation Laws Amendment Bill 39 of 2013 proposes the introduction of a new section (section 23M) to the Income Tax Act (ITA) to limit the deduction of interest incurred by a debtor in respect of a debt owed to a creditor that is in a ‘controlling relationship’ with the debtor and the interest in question is not subject to South African tax. The restriction will apply to interest incurred on or after 1 January 2015. In essence, the section limits the deduction for interest paid between connected persons where the interest is not taxed in the hands of the recipient to an amount determined with reference to 40% of taxable income before interest and capital allowances.
Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 – Deemed exchange gains & losses
Section 24I(10) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (ITA) has been replaced by a new provision for years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2013. Section 24I(10) of the ITA deferred unrealised exchange gains and losses on exchange items between connected persons and groups companies until they were realised. However, section 24I(10) has been deleted and replaced with section 24I(10A)with effect from years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2013.
Transfer Pricing adjustments: What are the consequences?
Author: Billy Joubert (Deloitte) South Africa’s transfer pricing rules changed radically for years of assessment starting on or after 1 April 2012. This means that the consequences of such an adjustment being made now are very different, depending on whether the adjustment relates to a year of assessment commencing before – or after – 1 April 2012. Perhaps the most fundamental change was in relation to the mechanics for making transfer pricing adjustments. As regards the consequences of TP adjustments, these are also now very different. Many of the TP adjustments currently being made or contemplated relate to years of assessment commencing before 1 April 2012. For ease of reference we shall refer to such years as old years.
Assumption of contingent liabilities
The South African Revenue Service (SARS) recently released its discussion paper (Discussion Paper) on the tax implications of the assumption of contingent liabilities in the context of a sale of business as a going concern and where the assumption of the contingent liabilities is in part settlement of the purchase price of the assets. Whereas the purchase price can generally be settled by, for example, a cash payment, the assumption of unconditional liabilities, loan account, or the issue of shares, the Discussion Paper specifically deals with the assumption of contingent liabilities.
International Tax – South African executives on foreign boards
Introduction South African companies are increasingly looking to global expansion to build their capabilities and expand their operations into foreign jurisdictions. Where South Africans serve on the boards of foreign companies and render services to foreign entities, they typically do so in terms of split employment contracts in respect of their services rendered within and outside of South Africa. In addition to the remuneration, they may also receive directors’ fees for services rendered to the boards. Their employment contracts with the foreign company and the requirement
Tax consequencies of carrying on business through an agent
A decision in the Tax Court in the Western Cape (Case No. 13002) related to the question whether a company was carrying on farming. The company (Company A) had acquired a piece of land on which there were substantial plantations. Company A itself did not wish to exploit the plantations commercially, but wished to ensure their preservation. It therefore entered into an arrangement with a second company (Company B), in terms of which Company B had the right to exploit the timber, but was obliged to maintain the rotation by planting trees to replace those that were cut. Company B was entitled to all proceeds from the exploitation and was obliged to meet its own costs and to keep the plantations insured against fire.
Taxation of Issue of shares as consideration
In order for the ownership of assets to pass from a seller to a buyer it is necessary that the parties agree three essential elements: price, terms and structure. These three elements are interdependent in any transaction. For instance, after agreeing the price of a transaction, i.e. the number of rands or rand value of the consideration the seller will receive, the parties will need to agree the terms such as whether the price will be paid by means of cash, debt and/or shares as well as the timing of these payments.
Plan for Tax on Foreign Services Questioned
The proposed introduction of a 15% withholding tax on consultancy, management and technical fees for services rendered by a foreign consultant or company to a South African firm has been described as “unworkable”. The tax was proposed in the Taxation Laws Amendment Bill at the end of last year and was aimed at protecting the tax base, as the fees generated local deductions and thereby gave rise to a potential erosion of the tax base, the Treasury said in its explanatory memorandum to the bill.
International Tax – Base erosion and profit shifting
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) issued a 15 point action plan on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). The plan aims to “effectively prevent double non-taxation” and to ensure that low tax jurisdictions will not be able to continue with practices that “artificially segregate taxable income from the activities that generate it”. It seems that the action plan of the OECD will have a huge impact on worldwide transfer pricing and these actions must be carefully considered as it may have a major impact on how multinational groups operate.