Default judgement in tax litigation

Author: Robert Gad and Jadyne Devnarain (ENSAfrica) In terms of the current Tax Court rules published under the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962, where the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) did not comply with the prescribed time frames in respect of dispute resolution, practically, there was little that a taxpayer could do. This could change in terms of the proposed new Tax Court rules expected to come into force later this year.

The next step in carbon taxes: Carbon Offset paper

n May 2013 the Department of Treasury published a Carbon Tax Policy Paper for public comment. A revised version of the document was due to be published in July 2013, however, following public objection and comment this document was not forthcoming. In February 2014 the Minister of Finance confirmed in the Budget Speech that carbon taxes would be delayed until 2016 as “a package of measures is needed to address climate change and reduce emissions”. These measures include the development of a Carbon Offset in terms of which companies can reduce their tax liabilities.

SA Reserve Bank amends exchange control rules

South Africa’s exchange control rules require that a South African resident wishing to assign intellectual property to a foreign entity must obtain prior approval from the South African Reserve Bank. The Reserve Bank’s Financial Surveillance Department has recently issued a circular amending the exchange control rules. The amendment relaxes the exchange control rules, to a limited extent, to allow unlisted South African companies to list on stock exchanges located offshore and raise foreign loans and capital more easily.

Supreme Court of Appeal addresses administrative fairness in raising assessments and disputes before the Tax Court

An interesting judgment was handed down in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) on 12 June 2014 in the matter of Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v Pretoria East Motors (Pty) Ltd (291/12) [2014] ZASCA 91. The taxpayer operated a car dealership in Pretoria. The South African Revenue Service (SARS) conducted an audit on the taxpayer in respect of its 2000 to 2004 years of assessments, and as a result raised various additional assessments in respect of, inter alia, income and value-added tax (VAT).

Tax fraudsters sentenced

The scheme was discovered after seven years when Sars became suspicious because so many taxpayers used the same addresses. One of the most complex tax fraud trials the SA Revenue Service (Sars) ever had to deal was concluded on Monday, when the leaders of a crime syndicate were sentenced to between 20 and 15 years’ imprisonment.