SARS Company Income Tax Return changes

16 September 2024 The following Corporate Income Tax enhancements were implemented based on legal and form changes: Tax treatment of an asset acquired as government grant in kind: If a taxpayer acquires an asset as or with a government grant, wear and tear cannot be claimed on the asset. This also means that even if the taxpayer uses the grant to buy another asset, that something cannot be depreciated either (for tax purposes). Credit Agreements and Debtors Allowance: A new field for Credit agreement and debtors allowance (lay-by) (s24) will be added to the ITR14 return. This is an allowance that can be claimed in the current year, but it needs to be reversed in the following year. Additional deduction in respect of learnership agreements: A deduction for learnership agreements can only be allowed if the agreement was entered into before 1 April 2024 and therefore a new validation question Read More …

New tax requirements for foreign employers in South Africa: PAYE withholding obligations

Effective 22 December 2023, new South African tax legislation requires non-resident employers with a permanent establishment (PE) in the country to register as employers for employees tax (PAYE) purposes and to withhold PAYE from remuneration paid to their employees. This change could have a significant impact on employers with employees that opt to work in South Africa remotely, a situation that has become common recently. This new legislation means that foreign employers need to take greater care to ensure compliance with regard to their remote working population.

Navigating tax assessments and objections in South Africa: A legal roadmap

Receiving a tax assessment from SARS is often the starting point for a complex journey for taxpayers. In South Africa, taxpayers have the right to contest an assessment if they believe it to be incorrect, but this process comes with its own set of rules and challenges. Understanding the grounds of assessment and the burden of proof Upon receiving a tax assessment, it is crucial for taxpayers to carefully review the details. If they disagree with the assessment, they have the right to lodge an objection. However, understanding the grounds on which the assessment was made is key. Unfortunately, there are instances where SARS fails to provide adequate reasons for its assessments, leaving taxpayers in the dark. In such cases, taxpayers can request the grounds for assessment within 30 business days from the date the assessment was issued. Once it has received the requested grounds for the assessment, the taxpayer Read More …

The VAT refund process

A VAT refund is an amount of VAT that is payable by SARS to a vendor. In terms of section 1 of the VAT Act No. 89 of 1991 (the VAT Act), a vendor means any person who is or is required to be registered under the VAT Act, provided that where the Commissioner has under section 23 or 50A determined the date from which a person is a vendor, that person shall be deemed to be a vendor from that date.

A new enhanced Corporate Income Tax Return with new challenges

On 16 September 2024 SARS released an enhanced Corporate Income Tax Return (ITR14) on its website. This new version of the ITR14 must be submitted by all companies with effect from this date. Amongst a number of changes to the ITR14 is the requirement that all companies are now required to provide detailed information of the individuals that are regarded as their beneficial owners. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in penalties and compliance notices. The aim is to enhance transparency and combat money laundering and terrorism financing by ensuring the identity of ultimate beneficial owners is known. The concept of beneficial ownership has been integrated into the corporate income tax return process to enhance transparency and combat illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. The following key points should be noted: a. Definition – Beneficial ownership in respect of a company means, an individual who, Read More …

Bad and doubtful debts – income tax issues

In the current economic climate, especially given the high interest rates, businesses often experience financial difficulties. This often results in an inability to settle outstanding debts owed and conversely, to recover debts due by customers. Irrecoverable or doubtful debts owed by or to a taxpayer may respectively result in an additional or reduced income tax liability. It is important to bear income tax principles in mind when dealing with these situations. This article focusses on the key income tax considerations for taxpayers relating to irrecoverable and doubtful debts. Banks and other types of moneylenders will generally be subject to other forms of tax treatment that are not covered here. A taxpayer may become entitled to a section 11(i) deduction for bad debts when a debt owed to that taxpayer becomes irrecoverable. Such a deduction can only be claimed in the year of assessment that the debt first becomes irrecoverable. This Read More …

Thistle Trust v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service CCT337/22

Case CCT 337/22 [2024] ZACC 19 Ordered Date: 08 February 2024 Judgement Date: 02 October 2024 Post JudgmentMedia Summary The following explanatory note is provided to assist the media in reporting this case and is not binding on the Constitutional Court or any member of the Court. On 2 October 2024, the Constitutional Court handed down judgment in an application for leave to appeal and a conditional application for leave to cross-appeal against a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The application concerned the applicability of the conduit principle to capital gains when distributed by multiple trusts in the same tax year in terms of the common law, section 25B and paragraph 80 of the Eighth Schedule of the Income Tax Act 28 of 1962. The conditional cross-appeal concerned whether the circumstances giving rise to the tax treatment by the Thistle Trust warranted the imposition of an understatement penalty.

Transfer pricing has finally washed up on South Africas shores

With increasing economic globalisation, revenue authorities around the world continue to shift their focus to issues of transfer pricing. Broadly, this fits in with the global move to combat so-called profit shifting, a practice where multinational groups attempt to concentrate their profits in low-tax countries in which they operate. In a moment that many tax practitioners have eagerly awaited, the Tax Court finally passed down its first judgment dealing with transfer pricing in the case of ABD Limited v Commissioner, SARS (IT14302). Between 2009 and 2012, the taxpayer licensed its intellectual property to subsidiaries operating in various other countries (opcos) against payment by these opcos of a royalty. For all of these opcos, this royalty was charged at the same flat rate of 1%. The South African Revenue Service (SARS) took the view that this 1% royalty was, in fact, not arm’s length and should have been higher. However, the Read More …

SA Budget 2024/25 – Tax policy on Tax administration of various taxes

Customs and Excise Act Reviewing the process on packages imported through eCommerce The approach to packages imported through eCommerce will be reviewed to ensure that the appropriate balance between simplicity and compliance with customs and excise requirements is being maintained.   Timeframe for delivery of export bills of entry Certain exporters face legitimate challenges in complying with the timeframe for submitting export bills of entry. It is proposed that the Customs and Excise Act be amended to enable the SARS Commissioner to provide, by rule, for a process by which exporters can be allowed to submit export bills of entry at a different time than what is currently provided for in the act.   Simplifying the process of substituting bills of entry in certain circumstances It is proposed that the Customs and Excise Act be amended to simplify the process of substituting a bill of entry in certain circumstances where Read More …