Tax News

Corruption trial of former SARS official delayed

Author: Natasha Marrian (BDlive) The fraud and corruption case against former South African Revenue Service (SARS) official Mandisa Mokwena has again been shifted, this time to October 5. The case dates back to 2011. Ms Mokwena’s attorney, Johann Schafer, said on Monday that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) had asked for more time to decide whether to proceed with a corruption case against her. This was after she had made representations to the national director of public prosecutions on why the charges should be dropped.

High Court overrules tax court on input VAT claim on sponsorships

Author: Prof Peter Surtees (Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa) If a taxpayer receives money, goods and services from sponsors in return for providing branding and marketing services to the sponsors, output VAT is payable on the value of these receipts.  And if the sponsors decline to furnish tax invoices for the money, goods and services they receive from the taxpayer in return, may the taxpayer infer an input claim from available evidence?  The tax court ruled that, when output VAT was due on the value of the receipts; the taxpayer could claim no input credits in the absence of tax invoices.  On 6 February 2015 in ABC (Pty) Ltd v CSARS Case No A 129/2014 the High Court of the Western Cape overruled the tax court’s decision.

SARS clamps down on share buy backs followed by the issue of shares

In practice taxpayers often enter into arrangements in terms of which a company buys back its own shares held by certain shareholders, and immediately thereafter issues new shares to new shareholders. This practice has long caused tax avoidance concerns for the South African Revenue Service (SARS), as it could circumvent the payment of capital gains tax (CGT) by the shareholder whose shares are bought back.

SARS extends the list of reportable arrangements

The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (SARS) issued an important notice (SARS Notice) on 16 March 2015. The SARS Notice was published in terms of s35(2) and s36(4) of the Tax Administration Act, No 28 of 2011 (TAA). Sections 34 to 39 of the TAA deal with so-called ‘reportable arrangements’. Essentially, if an arrangement has certain characteristics (as listed in s35(1) of the TAA) or if SARS has listed the arrangement in a public notice (in terms of s35(2) of the TAA), then the person who promotes the arrangement (called a promoter) and the person who may derive a tax benefit from the arrangement (called the participant) must report the arrangement to SARS.

Transfer Pricing Reportable arrangements – Notice published in Government Gazette

A public notice (the “Notice”) was issued in the Government Gazette dated 16 March 2015 in terms of which the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service lists arrangements which are listed as reportable arrangements in terms of section 35(2) of the Tax Administration Act No 28 of 2011 (“TAA”), and excluded arrangements in terms of section 36(4) of the TAA. The effective date of the Notice is 16 March 2015.

Budget 2015: VAT untouched

Author: Deborah Tickle, Partner International Corporate Tax KPMG. Taxpayers were warned as far back as October 2014 that Budget 2015 would not be a happy one for them. Finance Minister, Nhlanhla Nene made it abundantly clear that more tax revenue was needed in the 2015/2016 year to cover the country’s budget deficit or “gap” between expenditure and revenue. The only question was which taxes would increase to “mind” this gap.