Retirement reform: how you’ll score

By Laura du Preez Making trustees of  retirement funds responsible for choosing a default annuity for you on  retirement could result in you getting  a better pension, delegates to  the Pension Lawyers Association conference heard this week. Kobus Hanekom, head of strategy,  governance and compliance at Simeka Consultants & Actuaries, an  affiliate of Sanlam Employee Benefits, says there is a huge shift in  responsibility to trustees in National Treasury’s latest retirement  reform proposals, which were released with the Budget late last month.

Recent case on judicial review of SARS’ actions in terms of PAJA

By Hanneke Farrand and Esther Geldenhuys, ENS – Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) increased their audit activity and focus on the collection of tax. Taxpayers often rely on protection in terms of administrative law and in particular, the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, No. 3 of 2000 (“PAJA”). An important rule under PAJA is that judicial review can only be used as a last resort after all other internal remedies have been exhausted and taxpayers therefore first have to make use of the objection and appeal procedures provided for in the Tax Administration Act, No. 28 of 2011. The case outlined below highlights the nature of some of SARS’ actions that may be brought under judicial review in terms of section 6 of PAJA and the circumstances under which such a review application might be dismissed.

Commissioner's discretion to levy or remit penalties under the Tax Administration Act

By Beric Croome and Elsabe Strydom , ENS – Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs The Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 (“TAA”) which came into effect on 1 October 2012 (bar a few specific sections) introduced two types of penalties, namely administrative non-compliance penalties and understatement penalties. This article considers whether the Commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) has any discretion to levy the above mentioned penalties as compared to any discretion provided for in the repealed penalty provisions as contained in the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (“ITA”). The taxpayer’s right to have the penalties remitted as per the TAA compared to the taxpayer’s right to remittance in terms of the ITA is also considered.

SARS and your bank account

On 29 February 2012, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) issued a notice in Government Gazette No 35090 (Notice No 173) relating to the liability of certain institutions, most notably banks, to furnish SARS with financial information about taxpayers. The notice was issued in terms of s69 of the Income Tax Act, No 58 of 1962, which section has been superseded by s26 of the Tax Administration Act, No 28 of 2011 (TAA).

South Africa's New Tax Administration Act Is In Force

by Lorys Charalambous, Tax-News.com, Cyprus 04 October 2012 The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has announced that the Tax Administration Act (TAA), which is intended to simplify and provide greater coherence in South African tax administration law, and was promulgated on July 4, 2012, largely came into effect on October 1, 2012.