Recent case on judicial review of SARS’ actions in terms of PAJA

By Hanneke Farrand and Esther Geldenhuys, ENS – Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs The South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) increased their audit activity and focus on the collection of tax. Taxpayers often rely on protection in terms of administrative law and in particular, the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, No. 3 of 2000 (“PAJA”). An important rule under PAJA is that judicial review can only be used as a last resort after all other internal remedies have been exhausted and taxpayers therefore first have to make use of the objection and appeal procedures provided for in the Tax Administration Act, No. 28 of 2011. The case outlined below highlights the nature of some of SARS’ actions that may be brought under judicial review in terms of section 6 of PAJA and the circumstances under which such a review application might be dismissed.

SARS : Basic Guide to Income Tax for PBO and Donations deductions

In South Africa, an organisation that has a non-profit motive or is established or registered as a non-profit organisation does not automatically qualify for preferential tax treatment. An organisation will only enjoy preferential tax treatment after it has applied for and been granted approval as a Public Benefit Organisation (PBO).

Do your objections and appeals to Sars correctly

Do your objections and appeals to Sars correctly ..… or else it could become very costly. The taxpayer in H R Computek (Pty) Ltd v CSars (830/2011) [2012] ZASCA 178 learnt a painful and expensive lesson about the importance of adhering to the rules and provisions relating to objection and appeal.  In particular, this judgement reminds taxpayers, not for the first time, that the grounds of your objection are extremely important because you are stuck with them all the way through the judicial process.

SARS and your bank account

On 29 February 2012, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) issued a notice in Government Gazette No 35090 (Notice No 173) relating to the liability of certain institutions, most notably banks, to furnish SARS with financial information about taxpayers. The notice was issued in terms of s69 of the Income Tax Act, No 58 of 1962, which section has been superseded by s26 of the Tax Administration Act, No 28 of 2011 (TAA).

High Court interprets NWK judgment

Judgment in the case of Mariana Bosch and Ian McClelland v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (case no A94/2012) was handed down on 20 November 2012 by a full bench of the Western Cape High Court. The main judgment was written by Davis J (Baartman J concurring) and a separate judgment was written by Waglay J. The matter was on appeal from the Tax Court.

South Africa's New Tax Administration Act Is In Force

by Lorys Charalambous, Tax-News.com, Cyprus 04 October 2012 The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has announced that the Tax Administration Act (TAA), which is intended to simplify and provide greater coherence in South African tax administration law, and was promulgated on July 4, 2012, largely came into effect on October 1, 2012.